The corrections of the Anatomy, which correspondents or in- vestigation
have suggested, with the exception of some typog,ra- &cal errors, are chiefly additive. We will not go into these mi- nutely on the present occasion, as it is our intention, at a period not very distant, to embody the whole of the observations with which we may from time to time be favoured, in a new and im- proved edition of the Anatomy. We only revert to the subject now, for the purpose of' noticing some cases in which we have unintentionally done injustice to individuals. It is quite unneces- sary to observe, that we shall be at times most disposed to correct errors of that kind.
On looking over the table of Borough Lords, we find the Earl of MULGRAVE put down as patron of Scarborough. This is a pal- pable mitake ; Lord MULGRAVE has, we believe, had no con- nexion wills Scarborough for a number of years. In fact Scar- borough is not a nomination, though it is a close borough ; and Lord MULGRAVE (then Lord NORMANBY) was actually turned out on account of his independent principles. Mr. PHIPPS, Lord MULGRAVE'S uncle, is not in office at present ; he went out with the last Ministry. He was a Tory—Lord MULGRAVE is and always has been a steady Reformer.
We have in a note described Bishop PHILLPOTTS as the author of Pro-Catholic as well as Anti-Catholic pamphlets. The Western Luminary offers us a handsome price for any copies of them which we may produce. The wag knows his security !: —the fact is, the Bishop did not write for the Catholics, he only ratted for them.
Previous page
