It was noticed last week in our account of the
proceedings at the in- quiry into the causes of Mrs. Norrington's death, that the Coroner's "animus against the honueopathic Doctor was evident." From a letter written by Dr. Epps and published in Wednesday's Morning Chronicle, (the material statements in which are not only uncontradicted, but con- firmed by the husband,) we learn that the reporters suppressed some very important evidence, and which if fairly given would have presented the case in a different light. We allude especially to the alleged eon- stipatiom w4ch it appears had been, removed by Dr. Epps.'s own &Fee. tions. The particulars, though gt for full .discussion p medial journal, are-,out of place in the Spectator; and we shall therefore only remark, that by Coroner and reporters Dr. Epps seems to have hem unfairly treated, and any prejudice against him in consequence of the inquest will be unjust.
Previous page
