Ancient & modern
WHETHER war against Iraq is justified or not, hardly a day goes by without someone condemning it because (a) the enemy will be crushingly defeated and (b) the West will seize control of Iraqi oil supplies. And these are reasons for not fighting? On the other hand, proponents of the war argue that we have a humanitarian mission to save Iraq from itself. On both counts the Romans would have thought we had lost our senses.
Though, as Cicero said, 'taxes are the sinews of the state'. from 167 BC Romans paid no direct taxes, only those demanded in the course of certain sorts of activities (e.g., harbour dues). Lucrative foreign wars were the reason, increasing state revenues dramatically during this and subsequent periods. In 62 BC, for example. Pompey returned in triumph to Rome after sorting out the Eastern empire, not only depositing vast quantities of gold and silver in Rome's treasury but almost trebling Rome's annual income. Plutarch tells us that Julius Caesar captured and sold more than a million slaves during his conquest of Gaul. Octavian (Caesar's nominated heir) inherited this fortune and, when he defeated Antony and Cleopatra at the battle of Actium in 31 BC, seized Egypt, a stupendously wealthy territory, before renaming himself Augustus and becoming Rome's first official emperor.
When the Roman emperor Trajan finally ended the trouble on the borders of Romania in An 106, he lost a lot of men, but the result was that Romania became a province (Dacia) and Trajan returned to Rome with five million pounds of gold and ten million of silver — about 30 times Rome's total annual revenue. Coins were struck throughout the empire to celebrate the occasion. When Trajan returned to Rome in AD 107, foreign embassies from as far as India were waiting to greet him, keen to avoid a similar fate. Handouts were given to the Roman people, and an unprecedented five months of games put on.
Romans conducted foreign policy in terms purely of their own self-interest. To risk Roman lives because a foreign people could not sort out its own affairs would have struck them as little short of criminal. The interesting question, though, is why fund-raising through war of the sort conducted by Pompey, Caesar and Trajan, commonplace throughout human history till the early 20th century, is frowned on these days in the West. What generated the change in attitude? The disastrous economic consequences for the winners of the first and second world wars? The United Nations?
Peter Jones
Previous page
